Logo IIIS


International Institute of
Informatics and Systemics
2025 Summer Conferences Proceedings




Reflexivity as a Compass: The European AI Act and Its Implications for U.S. Higher Education Institutions
Jasmin Cowin
Proceedings of the 19th International Multi-Conference on Society, Cybernetics and Informatics: IMSCI 2025, pp. 102-107 (2025); https://doi.org/10.54808/IMSCI2025.01.102
The 19th International Multi-Conference on Society, Cybernetics and Informatics: IMSCI 2025
Virtual Conference
September 9-12, 2025


Proceedings of IMSCI 2025
ISSN: 2831-722X (Print)
ISBN (Volume): 978-1-950492-86-2 (Print)

Authors Information | Citation | Full Text |

Jasmin Cowin
Rockefeller Institute of Government, Albany, New York, United States


Cite this paper as:
Cowin, J. (2025). Reflexivity as a Compass: The European AI Act and Its Implications for U.S. Higher Education Institutions. In N. Callaos, J. Horne, B. Sánchez, M. Savoie (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Multi-Conference on Society, Cybernetics and Informatics: IMSCI 2025, pp. 102-107. International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.54808/IMSCI2025.01.102
DOI: 10.54808/IMSCI2025.01.102
ISBN: 978-1-950492-86-2 (Print)
ISSN: 2831-722X (Print)
Copyright: © International Institute of Informatics and Systemics 2025
Publisher: International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics

Abstract
This narrative analysis explores how the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) holds the potential to shape institutional discourse of U.S. higher education. As artificial intelligence becomes deeply embedded in university operations, from admissions and instruction to monitoring and assessment, it raises urgent questions about institutional purpose, power, and accountability. Drawing on Kantian ethics, the analysis highlights the tension between external regulatory structures and internal moral reasoning. The EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689), with its risk-based classification of AI systems and its extraterritorial provisions, introduces binding obligations for transparency, oversight, and ethical alignment in educational applications. These obligations challenge existing norms of voluntary governance in U.S. academia and signal a shift toward anticipatory and structured forms of technological oversight. Within this landscape, reflexivity is positioned not as a rhetorical gesture but as a necessary institutional capacity. It refers to the ongoing process of self-examination that engages with embedded assumptions, power dynamics, and the normative dimensions of algorithmic systems. This analysis argues that reflexivity must guide institutional responses to AI governance if universities are to align technological adoption with their academic values and global responsibilities.
Full Text



contact-us  
  Postal Address:
  13750 West Colonial Dr, Suite 350-408
  Winter Garden, Florida 34787, USA
  All rights reserved.
  © 2026 International Institute
   of Informatics and Systemics